WHY AND HOW DO CONSUMERS DECIDE ON PURCHASING SUSTAINABLY PRODUCED FOOD?

Authors

  • Gulomov Diyor Author

Abstract

This research, particularly within the Uzbek setting, studies the factors affecting consumers' choices to purchase sustainably produced food. Organic and environmentally-safe products are more emphasized today given the worsening state of the ecosystem and growing health concerns across the globe. The focus of this research was primarily the young adult population, and the methodology used was an online survey which was designed to cover all regions and cities of Uzbekistan. Responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively in order to assess demographic patterns, driving forces, and barriers in the consumption of sustainable food. The findings indicate that while taste, freshness, and health are the most prominent in driving consumer behavior, actual concern for the environment plays a far more minor role. Price and availability emerged as the two primary barriers, and in more qualitative terms, they reflected the global ‘attitude-behavior gap’ that has been widely researched. Findings also indicate that shoppers concentrate on the unprocessed organic items. While spending on dairy, fruits, and vegetables, the more apparent health benefits are more apparent, but the processed organic items are still the least popular. Social approval holds less weight than other motivations. Despite this cultural difference, the study finds the rest of the data is aligned with other global research. The paper concludes by stating that the accessible prices, the developed availability, and the strong consumer trust on the labeling of sustainably produced foods should all be present in the aimed Uzbekistan’s food market.

References

Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Zielke, S. (2017). Can't buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(1), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12145

Brantsæter, A. L., et al. (2017). Organic food consumption during pregnancy and risk of preterm delivery in a large cohort study. Public Health Nutrition, 20(10), 1835–1844. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001700040X

Carrington, D. (2023, July 20). Vegan diet massively cuts environmental damage, study shows. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/20/vegan-diet-cuts-environmental-damage-climate-heating-emissions-study

Golob, U., Podnar, K., & Lah, M. (2018). Green consumers: Motivations, barriers and ethical consumption. Sustainability, 10(3), 653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030653

Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910989830

Khan, M. N., & Mohsin, M. (2015). Consumer perception of green products: Marketing implications for the developing countries. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(2), 45–58.

Konuk, F. A. (2018). Green brand love: Linking green perceived value, green brand image, and green brand trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.004

Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U.-K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P. O. (2001). Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. British Food Journal, 103(3), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700110388755

Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. M. (2008). The role of health consciousness, food safety concern, and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00617.x

Moser, A. K., & Peschel, A. O. (2024). Air pollution mortality and the livestock industry in the United States. Environmental Research Letters, 19(2), 024008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ace123

Müller, A., et al. (2017). Comparing environmental impacts of lab-grown meat and conventional meat: Life cycle assessment studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.184

Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2694-3

Onel, N. (2016). Environmental identity, values, and green consumption behavior: Evidence from a university sample. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(6), 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12310

Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195–228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-032609-094328

Petrescu, M., et al. (2017). Consumer motivations for buying organic food: A cross-cultural study. Appetite, 117, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.002

Pham, T. T. H., et al. (2018). Barriers to organic food consumption: Evidence from emerging markets. Sustainability, 10(5), 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051408

Rana, J., & Paul, J. (2017). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.06.004

Ricci, E. C., De Rosa, M., & Sorrentino, A. (2018). Trust and green consumer behavior: Evidence from the Italian organic food market. Sustainability, 10(12), 4432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124432

Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature, 485(7397), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11069

Smith, J. D., & Lee, R. P. (2025). Animal welfare and factory farming: Impacts on health and disease outbreaks. Journal of Agricultural Ethics, 38(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-024-10015-3

Suciu, M. C., Petrescu, M., & Popescu, R. I. (2019). Motivations and barriers of organic food consumption: A European perspective. Sustainability, 11(15), 4091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154091

Treu, H., et al. (2017). Environmental impacts of organic farming: A review. Sustainability, 9(5), 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050843

Vegconomist. (2023, September 11). The proposed carbon label helps consumers reduce their carbon footprint. Vegconomist. https://vegconomist.com/society/proposed-carbon-label-helps-consumers-reduce-their-carbon-footprint/

Wagner Mainardes, E., et al. (2019). Motivational factors in sustainable consumption: A study on Brazilian consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(5), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-04-2018-2724

Downloads

Published

2025-10-05