INTERACTIVE WAYS OF IMPROVING COMMUNICATIVE SKILLS
Abstract
Developing effective communicative skills is essential in education, professional settings, and everyday social interactions. Interactive methods have emerged as promising tools for enhancing these skills, emphasizing learner engagement, meaningful discourse, and real-world applicability. This article investigates the theoretical foundations, practical applications, and empirical outcomes associated with interactive approaches aimed at improving communicative competencies. Drawing on socio-cultural theory, constructivist viewpoints, and communicative language teaching principles, the literature underscores the value of role-plays, collaborative projects, debates, and technology-mediated tasks in promoting authentic language use. Research findings suggest that learners who engage in interactive activities often report higher motivation, reduced anxiety, and improved language performance. Nonetheless, challenges such as large class sizes, resource limitations, and cultural expectations may hinder implementation. The article concludes by advocating for strategic integration of interactive methods in curricula, ongoing teacher support, and purposeful assessment frameworks to sustain communicative development over the long term.
References
[1] Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge University Press.
[2] Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages: An Introduction. Routledge.
[3] Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
[4] Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages Are Learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
[5] Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
[6] Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language Assessment in Practice: Developing Language Assessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World. Oxford University Press.
[7] Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Penguin.
[8] Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 2–27). Longman.
[9] Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Language Teaching, 47(3), 349–362.
[10] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
[11] Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford University Press.
[12] Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.
[13] Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism vs. constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14.
[14] Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
[15] Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[16] Savignon, S. J. (2002). Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. Yale University Press.
[17] Willis, J. (1996). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. Longman.
[18] Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role Play. Oxford University Press.
[19] Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group Dynamics in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press.
[20] Stoller, F. L. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning. In G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-Based Second and Foreign Language Education (pp. 19–40). Information Age.
[21] Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching & Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning (2nd ed.). Pearson.
[22] Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford University Press.
[23] Ellis, R. (2003). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.
[24] Freeman, D. (1998). Doing Teacher Research: From Inquiry to Understanding. Heinle & Heinle.
[25] Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Routledge.
[26] Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
[27] Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Allyn & Bacon.
[28] Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2013). Argumentation and Debate (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[29] Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93–105.
[30] Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426–439.
[31] Jacobs, G. M., Power, M. A., & Loh, W. I. (2002). The Teacher’s Sourcebook for Cooperative Learning: Practical Techniques, Basic Principles, and Frequently Asked Questions. Corwin Press.
[32] Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137.
[33] Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95.
[34] Comas-Quinn, A. (2011). Learning to teach online. ReCALL, 23(3), 218–232.
[35] Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
[36] Anderson, J. (2019). Activities for cooperative learning in large classes. English Teaching Forum, 57(1), 34–43.
[37] Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
[38] Li, D. F. (1998). Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing communicative approaches in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677–703.
[39] Carless, D. (2008). Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 331–338.
[40] Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
[41] Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218.
[42] Park, J. (2017). Effects of role-playing on speaking skills in an EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 298–312.
[43] Schneider, C. (2018). Project-based language learning in secondary education: A quasi-experimental study. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 245–264.
[44] Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, Orientations, and Motivations in Language Learning. Blackwell.
[45] Tsiplakides, I., & Keramida, A. (2010). Helping students overcome foreign language speaking anxiety. International Education Studies, 3(4), 39–44.
[46] Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.
[47] Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[48] McGroarty, M. (1989). The benefits of cooperative learning arrangements in second language instruction. NABE Journal, 13(2), 127–143.
[49] Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion.
[50] Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.
