APPLICATION OF MODULAR CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES AND OPEN BUILDING PRINCIPLES TO THE FORMATION OF AN ADAPTIVE RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT
Abstract
This paper explores the discrepancy between the extended lifespan of load-bearing building frameworks and the swift functional aging of interior layouts and technical systems. The research seeks to validate an architectural and structural concept for an adaptable housing setting, founded on merging Open Building concepts with modern modular assembly methods. The research material encompasses analyses of Open Building theory, literature on modular building, structural connections, plug-and-play technical apparatus, and building codes for seismic construction in Uzbekistan. The research approach integrates comparative scrutiny, examination of finished projects, structural-logical synthesis, a life-cycle viewpoint as an evaluative structure for assessing efficacy, and the contrasting of structural designs based on dismantlability, maintainability, seismic response, and hardiness. The analysis shows that pairing a long-lasting Support framework with a mutable Infill section allows shifting from a fixed design paradigm to an asynchronous pattern of building updating without complete dismantling. It is determined that modular and composite systems employing reversible mechanical fastenings, encompassing bolted links with vibration-dampening inserts and components utilizing shape memory materials, present the highest adaptive capability. Furthermore, relocating utility conduits to designated distribution areas and employing BIM/BEMS platforms enhances spatial adaptability and boost whole-life management. The practical relevance of these findings resides in the utility of the suggested methodology for residential planning in earthquake-prone zones of Uzbekistan, where flexibility, robustness, and lowered costs over the building's service period need to be attained concurrently.
References
1. Brand, S. How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. New York: Viking, 1994.
2. Goskomarkhitekstroy. KMK 2.01.03-96: Norms and Regulations for Construction in Seismic Zones. Tashkent: State Committee for Architecture and Construction of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1996.
3. Habraken, N. J. Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. London: The Architectural Press, 1972.
4. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 62746-10-1:2018. Systems Interface Between Customer Energy Management System and the Power Management System - Part 10-1: Open Automated Demand Response, 2018.
5. Kim, S. A. A Study on the Planning Characteristics of the Infill System with Consideration of the Variability of Long-Life Housing // International Conference on Architectural, Civil and Hydraulics Engineering (ICACHE 2015). Paris: Atlantis Press, 2015.
6. Pronk, A., Lichtenberg, J. Slimline Floor, an Invention by Pronk and Lichtenberg // Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2023: Integration of Design and Fabrication. 2023.
7. Ryńska, E. D. The Economics of Adaptive Reuse - Comparative Cost Analysis of Revitalization vs. Demolition and Reconstruction at Radex Park Marywilska // Buildings. 2025. Vol. 15. No. 4.
8. Smit, M. Building Layers: Insights into the Concept of 'Shearing Layers'. TU Delft OpenCourseWare, 2024.
9. Timber Development UK. 2024 Embodied Carbon Data for Timber Products. London, 2024.
10. Yang, Z. et al. Seismic Performance of Self-Centering Prestressed Steel Frame Joints Based on Shape Memory Alloys (SMA) and Prestressed Steel Strands (PSS) // Applied Sciences. 2025. Vol. 15. No. 22.
11.Gulsara, R. (2023). Modernization of Digital Transformation in Construction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION, 2(1), 51-53.
Rajapovna, R. G. (2025). IMPROVEMENT OF THE STAFF TRAINING SYSTEM AND REFLECTIONS ON NEW PEDAGOGY OF ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION. SHOKH LIBRARY, 1(12).
13.Makhamova, M. (2024). Architecture for an inclusive society: creating accessible environments for people with disabilities, designing inclusive spaces and buildings. Science and innovation, 3(C3), 120-149.
14.Bazarovna, M. M. (2023). BUILDING MULTICULTURAL ARCHITECTURE IN THE CITY ENVIRONMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SPIRITUALITY: sacred, multiculturalism, multicultural space, model. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, MECHANICS AND MODERN ARCHITECTURE, 483-490.
15.Makhamova, M., & Azimova, D. (2025). Forerunners of the Study and Analysis of the Basics of the Typology of Buildings and Elements of Landscape Architecture of Modern Wellness Centers. TATALOKA Учредители: Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP), 27(1), 95-115.
Rajapovna, R. G. (2025). IMPROVEMENT OF THE STAFF TRAINING SYSTEM AND REFLECTIONS ON NEW PEDAGOGY OF ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION. SHOKH LIBRARY, 1(12).




















