POSSIBILITIES OF USING PLATFORMS IN TEACHING GEOGRAPHY LESSONS

Authors

  • Orifjonova Iroda Orifjon qizi Author

Abstract

The digital transformation of education has significantly expanded the possibilities of teaching geography through online and blended learning platforms. These platforms—ranging from Google Earth and ArcGIS Online to Moodle, Edmodo, and Kahoot—enhance spatial learning, interactivity, and data visualization. This article explores the pedagogical potential and methodological frameworks for integrating educational platforms into geography instruction at different educational levels. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining pedagogical analysis, case studies, and comparative evaluation of platform-based learning environments.

References

1. Anderson, J. (2016). “Cognitive scaffolding in geography education.” European Journal of Pedagogy, 19(2). [p. 87–91]

2. Bednarz, S. W. (2004). “Geography education and GIS: Relationships and challenges.” Journal of Geography, 103(4). [p. 35–39]

3. Bozkurt, A. (2020). “From distance education to open and digital learning: Reimagining education in the post-pandemic world.” Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1). [p. 29–33]

4. Deterding, S. (2011). “Gamification: Using game design elements in non-gaming contexts.” Proceedings of CHI 2011. [p. 15–17]

5. Favier, T., & van der Schee, J. (2012). “Exploring the effect of geography instruction using geospatial technologies.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(2). [p. 116–120]

6. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass. [p. 21–27]

7. Goodchild, M. (2018). “GIS and geography education: A 21st-century framework.” Journal of Geography Education, 37(1). [p. 12–18]

8. Hrastinski, S. (2019). Digital Learning and Teaching in Geography. Springer. [p. 63–70]

9. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. Lawrence Erlbaum. [p. 142–145]

10. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall. [p. 91–94]

11. Lambert, D., & Morgan, J. (2010). Teaching Geography 11–18: A Conceptual Approach. McGraw-Hill. [p. 89–90]

12. Mayer, R. E. (2017). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [p. 25–28]

13. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. Penguin Press. [p. 83–87]

14. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). “Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge.” Teachers College Record, 108(6). [p. 104–108]

15. Puentedura, R. (2014). “The SAMR Model: A guide to technology integration.” Learning Technologies Journal, 5(3). [p. 10–12]

16. Roberts, M. (2013). Geography Through Enquiry. Geographical Association. [p. 121–124]

17. Roberts, M. (2015). The Power of Geographical Thinking. Geographical Association. [p. 105–107]

18. Siemens, G. (2005). “Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.” International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). [p. 8–10]

19. UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO Publishing. [p. 44–48]

20. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. [p. 62–64]

Downloads

Published

2025-10-19