CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING: TYPES, EFFECTIVENESS, AND BEST PRACTICES
Abstract
Corrective feedback is an essential component in developing writing skills, especially for language learners. This article examines various types of corrective feedback including direct, indirect, metalinguistic, peer, and technology-mediated feedback. The effectiveness of each type is analyzed in relation to learner proficiency, motivation, and autonomy. Findings suggest that a balanced approach combining different feedback types tailored to learner needs enhances both accuracy and learner engagement. The article also highlights the importance of a supportive learning environment and the potential of technology to complement traditional feedback methods.
References
1. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18.
2. Ferris, D. (2014). Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.
3. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.
4. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral Feedback in Classroom SLA: A Meta-Analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265-302.
5. Shintani, N. (2013). The Roles of Recasts and Prompts in Focus on Form in Classroom Language Learning. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 36-54.
6. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The Relative Effectiveness of Different Types of Direct Written Corrective Feedback. System, 37(2), 322-329.
7. Hyland, F. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.
8. Lee, I. (2017). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge University Press.
9. Li, S. (2010). The Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback in SLA: A Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309-365.
10. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118.
