FRANSUZ VA O‘ZBEK TILLARI ILMIY DISKURSIDA PERSUAZIV BIRLIKLARNI O‘RGANISHNING FANLARARO YONDASHUVLARI
Abstract
Mazkur maqolada fransuz va o‘zbek tillari ilmiy diskursida qo‘llaniladigan persuaziv birliklar fanlararo yondashuv asosida qiyosiy tahlil qilinadi.
References
1. Aristotel. (2007). On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 4th century BCE).
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.
4. Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Teun A. van Dijk. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Maingueneau, D. (2014). Discours et analyse du discours. Paris: Armand Colin.
7. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (2005). Le discours en interaction. Paris: Armand Colin.
8. Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1–23.
9. Oripovna, A. I. (2026). Fransuz va o‘zbek tillarida sodda gaplar tipologiyasi. Latin American journal of education, 6 (2), 164-168.
10. Oripovna, A. I. (2025). Enseigner le theme de l'ecologie lors de l'etude du français. Sustainability of education, socio-economic science theory, 3(29), 66-67.
