KEY CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA OF INDUSTRIAL SECTORS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE REGIONAL ECONOMY
Abstract
This article examines the key classification criteria of industrial sectors in the development of the regional economy. The study systematizes theoretical approaches to industrial classification based on technological intensity, resource dependence, value-added level, innovation capacity, export orientation, employment contribution, and environmental impact. The paper analyzes how different industrial sectors influence regional economic growth, structural transformation, competitiveness, and sustainable development. Special attention is given to the role of industrial diversification, digital transformation, and integration into global value chains in strengthening regional economic resilience. The research highlights that an effective classification of industrial sectors enables policymakers to design targeted industrial policies, optimize resource allocation, and ensure balanced socio-economic development of regions. The findings contribute to improving methodological approaches to industrial policy planning within the framework of sustainable regional development.
References
1. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In J. V. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2713–2739). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80018-X
2. Boisier, S. (2001). Regional development in the 21st century. Regional Studies, 35(6), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120075877
3. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
4. European Commission. (2020). Industrial strategy for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
5. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805
6. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
7. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics (8th ed.). Macmillan.
8. OECD. (2011). ISIC rev. 4 technology intensity definition. OECD Publishing.
9. OECD. (2019). OECD regional outlook 2019: Leveraging megatrends for cities and rural areas. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264312838-en
10. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Free Press.
11. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
12. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2022). Industrial development report 2022: The future of industrialization in a post-pandemic world. UNIDO.
13. Abduxoliqovna, R. M. (2024, November). THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL MARKETING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BUSINESS MODELS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES. In INTERDISCIPLINE INNOVATION AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH CONFERENCE (Vol. 3, No. 25, pp. 19-21).
14. Abduxolikovna, R. M. (2024). MARKETING STRATEGIES AND THEIR TYPES IN INCREASING PRODUCT COMPETITIVENESS IN INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES. IMRAS, 7(6), 294-300.
15. Abduxoliqovna, R. M., & Azizbek, G. (2023). WAYS TO ENSURE THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE POPULATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. THE THEORY OF RECENT SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF PEDAGOGY, 1(8), 54-57.
16. Radjabova, M. A., & Bozorova, M. S. (2021). Role of Commercial Banks in the Provision of Financial Services in Uzbekistan. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(10), 551-556.
17. Abduxolikova, R. M. (2023). ADVANTAGES OF MARKETING STRATEGIES IN ATTRACTING INDIVIDUAL AND CORPORATE CLIENTS. IMRAS, 6(8), 143-148.
18. Rajabova, M. (2023). ISTE'MOLCHILARNING AFZALLIKLARINI TAHLIL QILISHDA MARKETING TADQIQOTLARI VA XIZMATLARIDAN FOYDALANISH SAMARADORLIGI. ЦЕНТР НАУЧНЫХ ПУБЛИКАЦИЙ (buxdu. uz), 43(43).
