EUPHEMISMS IN EDUCATION: A LINGUISTIC AND SOCIO-CULTURAL ANALYSIS
Abstract
Euphemisms constitute a key linguistic strategy used to mitigate harsh meanings, manage social relations, and maintain institutional harmony. Despite their ubiquity, euphemisms in education have not been extensively analyzed compared to their presence in political, medical, or business discourse. This study investigates the forms, functions, and socio-pragmatic motivations of euphemisms used in educational contexts.
References
1. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and Dysphemism. Oxford University Press.
2. Brookhart, S. (2011). Grading and Feedback Practices. ASCD.
3. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
4. Clifford, M. (2014). The impact of softened feedback on student learning. Educational Review, 66(3).
5. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman.
6. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. Pantheon Books.
7. Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson.
8. Janks, H. (2010). Language and Power in School Contexts. Routledge.
9. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon.
10. Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology.
11. Rawson, H. (1981). A Dictionary of Euphemisms and Other Doubletalk. Crown Publishers.
