INNOVATIVE METHODS FOR DEVELOPING CREATIVE THINKING IN INFORMATICS CLASSES
Abstract
This article examines innovative pedagogical methods aimed at developing creative thinking in school Informatics classes. In the context of rapid technological advancement and digital transformation, Informatics education requires learners not only to acquire technical knowledge but also to think critically, creatively, and independently. The study explores modern approaches such as problem-based learning, project-based instruction, gamification, algorithmic creativity, digital design tools, and interdisciplinary integration within STEAM education. Particular attention is given to developing students’ skills in generating original ideas, solving non-standard problems, creating digital products, and applying computational thinking creatively. The analysis demonstrates that innovative teaching methods significantly enhance learner motivation, foster higher-order thinking skills, and strengthen students’ readiness for the demands of the digital age.
References
1. Bers, M. (2018). Coding as a Playground: Programming and Computational Thinking in the Early Childhood Classroom. Routledge.
2. Brown, N., Sentance, S., Crick, T., & Humphreys, S. (2014). Restarting the heart of computing: Computing education in UK schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(2), 1–22.
3. CSTA & ISTE. (2019). Computational Thinking Standards for Students. International Society for Technology in Education.
4. European Schoolnet. (2020). Future Classroom Toolkit: Innovative Practices in Digital Education. Brussels.
5. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.
6. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
7. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism: Research Reports and Essays. Ablex Publishing.
8. Kafai, Y. (2016). Connected Code: Why Children Need to Learn Programming. MIT Press.
9. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Teachers College Record, 111(3), 373–404.
10. OECD. (2021). 21st Century Skills and Digital Competence Frameworks. OECD Publishing.
11. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.
12. Resnick, M. (2017). Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play. MIT Press.
13. Resnick, M., & Silverman, B. (2005). Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. Interaction Design and Children Conference, 117–122.
14. Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137–172.
15. Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching programming. Informatics in Education, 16(1), 41–62.
16. Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158.
17. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Scholastic Testing Service.
18. UNESCO. (2020). Digital Frameworks for Creative and Computational Learning. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
19. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 47–58.
20. Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.
