MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THEONYM COMPONENT UNITS
Abstract
This article study names of deities and divine entities and offers valuable insights into the linguistic and cultural frameworks of societies. The article explores the morphological features of theonym component units, examining their structure, formation processes, and semantic implications. By analyzing the morphological characteristics of theonyms, we can better understand their roles within language and their significance in religious and cultural contexts.
References
1. Eshmuratova D.U. Interpretation about Religious Development of Western Scholars // American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education, Volume 02, Issue 10, 2024 ISSN (E): 2993-2769. – P.169-172. (www.grnjournal.us.)
2. Eshmuratova D.U. Religious Believe and Religious Understanding: Thoughts About Religious Language // Miasto Przyszłości Kielce 2024, ISSN-L: 2544-980 X. – P.902-905. (Impact Factor: 9.9)
3. Eshmuratova D.U. Problems of interpretation of theonyms by Western researchers // Best journal of innovation in science, research and development. ISSN: 2835-3579. Volume:03, Issue: 06|2024. – B.597-599. (www.bjisrd.com)
4. Eshmuratova D.U. Religious Units and their Connection With Religious Rituals and Traditions // Excellencia: International multi-disciplinary journal of education, Volume 02, Issue 10, 2024 ISSN (E): 2994-9521, https://multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje. – P. 589-592.
5. Bakker, E. J. (2006). “The Morphology of Proper Nouns: A Cross-Linguistic
Perspective”. Linguistic Typology, 10(1), 1-30.
6. Turner, M. “The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language”. Oxford University Press. 1996.
7. Hock, H. H., & Joseph, B. D. (2009). “Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics”. Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Geertz, C. (1973). “The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays”. Basic Books.
9. Woolard, K. A. (1985). “Language Variation and Cultural Hegemony: On the Sociolinguistic of Identity”. American Ethnologist, 12(4), - P.738-748.
10. Kuryłowicz, J. (1965). “The Inflectional Categories of the Noun”. In Studies in Morphology (pp. 1-12). University of Chicago Press.
11. Finkel, H. (2017). “The Names of God: Their Meaning and Significance”. Journal of Religious Linguistics, 5(2), - P.45-62.
12. Aldrin, J. (2018). “Morphological Patterns in Religious Language: A Study of Theonyms”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 28(1), - P.23-40.