MINIMALLY INVASIVE METHODS IN THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECTS
Abstract
Objective. To assess the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgical methods for ASD compared to traditional techniques, and to analyze postoperative outcomes and patient recovery periods.
References
1. Wang X., Li H., Chen Z. Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive vs. traditional surgery for atrial septal defect repair. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2022, Vol. 114, No. 2, pp. 345–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.09.024.
2. Davis P., Thompson L., Scott B. Postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. JAMA Surgery, 2021, Vol. 156, No. 5, pp. 435–448. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0301.
3. Patel N., Green C., Lee M. Complication rates in endoscopic cardiac surgery. Circulation, 2020, Vol. 142, No. 7, pp. 312–325. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047120.
4. Kim S., Stewart P., Lopez R. Comparison of robotic and endoscopic ASD repair. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2019, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 412–425. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz002.
5. Brown H., Adams J., Taylor F. Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery: Current perspectives. Innovations in Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2021, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 23–38. DOI: 10.1177/2195302020986112.
6. Zhao L., Martinez P., Wilson G. Minimally invasive techniques for congenital heart defects. Pediatric Cardiology, 2018, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 545–562. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-018-1905-2.
7. Johnson B., Harris L., Williams G. Advancements in endoscopic cardiac procedures. International Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 2020, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 102–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijc.2020.04.009.
8. European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for Congenital Heart Disease Surgery [Электронный ресурс] // European Society of Cardiology, 2022. URL: https://www.escardio.org/Guidelines (дата обращения: 15.01.2024).
9. American Heart Association. Atrial Septal Defect Repair Guidelines [Электронный ресурс] // American Heart Association, 2023. URL: https://www.heart.org/ASD-guidelines (дата обращения: 20.01.2024).
10. Рекомендации Европейского общества кардиохирургов по минимально инвазивным операциям [Электронный ресурс] // European Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2023. URL: https://www.escardio.org/EACTS-guidelines(дата обращения: 10.02.2024).
11. Pediatric Congenital Heart Surgery: A Multicenter Study [Электронный ресурс] // World Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2021. URL: https://www.wjps.org/CHD-study (дата обращения: 08.12.2023).
12. Chen Y., Patel M., Gonzales R. Economic analysis of robotic cardiac surgery. Health Economics Review, 2020, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 178–192. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-020-00267-4.
13. The Future of Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery: Trends and Innovations [Электронный ресурс] // Journal of Cardiovascular Innovations, 2022. URL: https://www.cardiovascular-innovations.com/future-trends (дата обращения: 22.01.2024).
14. Postoperative Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery [Электронный ресурс] // Pain Medicine Journal, 2021. URL: https://www.painmedjournal.com/PMCIS (дата обращения: 30.01.2024).
15. Lopez R., Kim S. Patient recovery and quality of life after ASD repair. Heart Surgery Forum, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 78–92. DOI: 10.1532/HSF.21.078.
16. Robotic vs. Endoscopic Surgery for ASD Closure: A Systematic Review [Электронный ресурс] // Journal of Medical Robotics, 2023. URL: https://www.jmedrobotics.com/ASD-review (дата обращения: 18.01.2024).
Author Contributions
Tursunov S.A. – clinical material collection, Abdurakhmanov A.A. – statistical analysis and software, manuscript approval, Mamataliev F.A. – manuscript writing, Sultanov O.S. – review and editing
